Peugeot 407 2008 vs Mazda 6 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.9 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 211 HP | 120 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 440 NM | 165 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12.1 seconds | 8.4 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 9.9 | 5.2 - 8.1 | |
|
Peugeot 407 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Peugeot 407 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 407 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1751 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Peugeot 407 has 71 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 407 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`183 | ~ 2`061 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 407 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |