Peugeot 3008 2009 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Peugeot 3008) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda CR-V) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Peugeot 3008 engine produces 38 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 93 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 8.2 | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 3008 consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Peugeot 3008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Peugeot 3008 is 16 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 512 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1604 litres | 955 litres | |
| Peugeot 3008 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 649 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Peugeot 3008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |