Peugeot 206 1999 vs Renault Laguna 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 3 HP more power than Renault Laguna, but torque is 1 NM less than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 206 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 407, Citroen Xsara Picasso | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2002 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Laguna 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 76 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1 metres less than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Peugeot 206 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 206 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |