Peugeot 206 1999 vs Honda Civic 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 22 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 37 NM more than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 407, Citroen Xsara Picasso | Used also on Honda CRX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 206 is 37 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |