Peugeot 206 2000 vs Peugeot 206 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 2000 engine produces 20 HP more power than Peugeot 206 1998, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Peugeot 206 1998. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 2000 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206 1998, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 2000 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206 1998. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 306, Citroen Xsara Picasso, Peugeot 106 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 2000 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 206 2000 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 206 2000 and Peugeot 206 1998 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 1130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`553 | 1`525 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
| |