Peugeot 206 2000 vs Honda Civic 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 50 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | Used also on Honda CRX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 206 is 37 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`553 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |