Peugeot 206 2000 vs Volkswagen Polo 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 135 NM | 152 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 35 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.1 | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 206 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.82 m | 3.74 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 206 is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 245 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 975 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |