Peugeot 206 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1999

 
Peugeot 206
1998 - 2001
Volkswagen Polo
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP125 HP
Torque: 135 NM152 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds8.7 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 206 engine produces 35 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.07.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 206 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway810 km on highway
590 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.82 m3.74 m
Width: 1.65 m1.63 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 206 is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1130 litres975 litres
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5251`500
Safety:
Quality:
below average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 206 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv