Peugeot 206 2002 vs Honda Civic 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | 110 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 7 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 40 NM more than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 7.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
1380 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
1040 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 206 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Citroen C2, Peugeot 1007 | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.82 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.38 m | |
Peugeot 206 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 206 is 37 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 225 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 600 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 206 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. The Honda Civic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 530 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`525 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |