Peugeot 206 1998 vs Skoda Felicia 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 11 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, but torque is 4 NM less than Skoda Felicia. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Felicia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Citroen Berlingo | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Felicia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Felicia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 206 is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, 1 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Peugeot 206 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 206 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |