Peugeot 206 1998 vs Renault Clio 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 NM | 131 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 30 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen C3, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Dokker, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 206 is 5 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Peugeot 206 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Peugeot 206 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 95 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`405 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 206, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |