Peugeot 206 1998 vs Peugeot 307 2002
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 307 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 15 HP less power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Peugeot 307. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 260'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen C3, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 60 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 1540 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`405 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Peugeot 206 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 307, so Peugeot 206 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |