Peugeot 206 2003 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 20 HP more power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Peugeot 306. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen Xsara Picasso, Peugeot 106 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2003 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 206 is 21 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 130 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Peugeot 206 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 206 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |