Peugeot 206 2002 vs Audi A3 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 8 HP more power than Audi A3, but torque is 1 NM less than Audi A3. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | Used also on Volkswagen Golf | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 33 cm shorter than the Audi A3, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 1110 litres | |
|
Audi A3 has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 140 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 118 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi A3, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Audi A3 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 206, so Audi A3 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Audi A3 has
| |