Peugeot 206 2002 vs Renault Clio 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 12 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Citroen C2, Peugeot 1007 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 206 is 1 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 1037 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 206 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Peugeot 206 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 45 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Clio has
| |