Peugeot 206 2005 vs Peugeot 207 2009
Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 147 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Peugeot 206 engine produces 10 HP less power than Peugeot 207, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Peugeot 207. Despite less power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
The Peugeot 207 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Peugeot 207 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Peugeot 206 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.82 m | 4.16 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.54 m | |
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 34 cm shorter than the Peugeot 207, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 337 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 1258 litres | |
Peugeot 207 has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 92 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 207. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 207 (by 266 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 207, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`567 | 1`705 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Peugeot 207 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Peugeot 207, so Peugeot 207 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Peugeot 207 has
| |