Peugeot 206 2005 vs Mazda 2 2007

 
Peugeot 206
2005 - 2006
Mazda 2
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP75 HP
Torque: 133 NM121 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds14 seconds
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive.
Peugeot 206 engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.55.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres43 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway930 km on highway
720 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.82 m3.90 m
Width: 1.65 m1.70 m
Height: 1.43 m1.48 m
Peugeot 206 is smaller.
Peugeot 206 is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
992 litres787 litres
Peugeot 206 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 205 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5151`480
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

high
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 22002400
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 206 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Mazda 2 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv