Peugeot 206 2005 vs Mazda 2 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Peugeot 206 and Mazda 2 have the same engine power, but Peugeot 206 torque is 1 NM less than Mazda 2. Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 2007 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 787 litres | |
| Peugeot 206 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 205 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |