Peugeot 206 2009 vs Skoda Fabia 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 10 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 12 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 1163 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Peugeot 206 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`421 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |