Peugeot 206 2009 vs Kia RIO 2011
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 109 HP | |
Torque: | 120 NM | 137 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Kia RIO is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 34 HP less power than Kia RIO, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Kia RIO. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 180 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
1040 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
710 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 18 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C2, Peugeot Bipper | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Hyundai i20 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia RIO might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.87 m | 4.05 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 17 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 288 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | no data | |
Kia RIO has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 43 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`421 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Kia RIO has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Kia RIO, so Kia RIO quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 5400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Kia RIO has
| |