Peugeot 206 2007 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 6, Mazda MX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2007 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2007 1.6 engine Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 30 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
402 litres | 1285 litres | |
| Peugeot 206 has 11 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 883 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`567 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |