Peugeot 206 2007 vs Renault Megane 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 35 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Megane engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C2, Peugeot Bipper | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2006 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Megane 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 31 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 13 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
402 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 118 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`567 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Peugeot 206 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Megane, so Peugeot 206 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |