Peugeot 206 2007 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| 1000 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 206 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C2, Peugeot Bipper | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 38 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
402 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 206 has 182 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 2 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`567 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |