Peugeot 206 2007 vs Mazda 2 2007
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 120 NM | 121 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 14 seconds | |
Peugeot 206 and Mazda 2 have the same engine power, but Peugeot 206 torque is 1 NM less than Mazda 2. Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
710 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C2, Peugeot Bipper | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
Peugeot 206 is 29 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 250 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
402 litres | 787 litres | |
Peugeot 206 has 152 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 385 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`567 | 1`480 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |