Peugeot 206 2002 vs Honda Civic 2001
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 9 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Honda Civic. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 407, Citroen Xsara Picasso | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 206 is 43 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 137 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`565 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |