Peugeot 206 2002 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2011
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 23 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 407, Citroen Xsara Picasso | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Trax | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 37 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | 698 litres | |
| Peugeot 206 has 189 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 667 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`565 | 1`598 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |