Peugeot 206 2002 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 11 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 19 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1136 litres | 1225 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 113 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 89 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`611 | 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 206, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |