Peugeot 206 2002 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 17 cm shorter than the Skoda Roomster, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1136 litres | 1780 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 137 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 644 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`611 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |