Peugeot 206 2002 vs Citroen Xsara 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Peugeot 206 engine produces 20 HP less power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Citroen Xsara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
| By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Suzuki Grand Vitara, Citroen C5, Peugeot 607 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 206 is 34 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1136 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`611 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |