Peugeot 206 2002 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 17.3 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Audi A2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine Skoda Fabia 2004 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Skoda Fabia 2004 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 19 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1225 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 113 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 206, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |