Peugeot 206 2002 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Peugeot 206 and Citroen Xsara have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 206 is 34 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |