Peugeot 206 2003 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Fabia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Citroen C4, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Audi A2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Fabia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2004 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Skoda Fabia 2004 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 19 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1136 litres | 1225 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 113 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 89 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 206, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |