Peugeot 206 2002 vs Renault Megane 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 107 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 32 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Citroen Berlingo | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 206 is 41 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 172 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Peugeot 206 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 206 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |