Peugeot 206 2002 vs Suzuki Baleno 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 96 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 21 HP less power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Suzuki Baleno. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Citroen Berlingo | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 35 cm shorter than the Suzuki Baleno, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | 375 litres | |
|
Suzuki Baleno has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 62 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Peugeot 206 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Baleno, so Peugeot 206 quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |