Peugeot 206 2002 vs Peugeot 307 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 307 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 35 HP less power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Peugeot 307. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Citroen Berlingo | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Peugeot 206 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 307 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 40 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2211 litres | |
|
Peugeot 307 has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 207 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Peugeot 307 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 307 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |