Peugeot 206 2002 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2011

 
Peugeot 206
2002 - 2005
Chevrolet Aveo
2011 - 2015
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP86 HP
Torque: 120 NM115 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.3 seconds12.2 seconds
Chevrolet Aveo is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 206 engine produces 11 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, but torque is 5 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.45.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres46 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway930 km on highway
720 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.03 m4.40 m
Width: 1.65 m1.74 m
Height: 1.46 m1.52 m
Peugeot 206 is smaller.
Peugeot 206 is 37 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 313 litres502 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data698 litres
Chevrolet Aveo has more luggage space.
Peugeot 206 has 189 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo.
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Aveo.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`573
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 10004800
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 206 has
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Chevrolet Aveo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv