Peugeot 206 2002 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2011
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 26 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Chevrolet Aveo. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 260'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Aveo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen C3, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Opel Adam | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Aveo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 37 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1136 litres | 698 litres | |
| Peugeot 206 has 189 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 438 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`568 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |