Peugeot 206 1998 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 and Mitsubishi Colt have the same engine power, but Peugeot 206 torque is 12 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Citroen Berlingo | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 206 is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 830 litres | |
| Peugeot 206 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 300 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |