Peugeot 206 2002 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Audi A2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine Skoda Fabia 2001 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Skoda Fabia 2001 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 14 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 206 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 1015 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 23 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 206, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |