Peugeot 206 2002 vs Skoda Fabia 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
| Peugeot 206 engine produces 7 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Despite less power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 14 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 206 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 1015 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 23 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 206, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |