Peugeot 206 2002 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 17.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 2 HP less power than Peugeot 306, but torque is 25 NM more than Peugeot 306. Despite less power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 306 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Citroen C2, Peugeot 1007 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Peugeot 206, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 206 is 21 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 1146 litres | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 130 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 306 (by 154 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Peugeot 206 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 206 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |