Peugeot 206 2002 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 27 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.52 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 760 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Peugeot 206 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. This could mean that the Peugeot 206 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 232 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |