Peugeot 206 2002 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 14 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 206 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 1016 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 24 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |