Peugeot 206 2005 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 50 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 135 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 82 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 952 litres | |
| Peugeot 206 has 280 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 40 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`585 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |