Peugeot 206 2009 vs Kia Picanto 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 85 HP | |
Torque: | 94 NM | 120 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.1 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
Kia Picanto is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 25 HP less power than Kia Picanto, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Kia Picanto. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 3.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
The Kia Picanto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
1060 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
740 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 260'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Picanto engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 17 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen C3, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i20, Hyundai i10, Kia RIO | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Picanto might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Kia Picanto engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Kia Picanto 2015 1.2 engine: Most owners speak positively about this engine. It has a simple and reliable design with no major engineering flaws. The main downsides are noticeable noise, vibrations, and modest power output. With proper ... More about Kia Picanto 2015 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.87 m | 3.60 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
Peugeot 206 is larger, but slightly lower. Peugeot 206 is 28 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 6 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 200 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 870 litres | |
Peugeot 206 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 206 has 45 litres more trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 122 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Peugeot 206 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`384 | 1`430 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | above average | |
Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 430 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |