Peugeot 206 2009 vs Ford KA 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 NM | 102 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.1 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Ford KA is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 9 HP less power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Ford KA. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 25 cm longer than the Ford KA, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 206 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 224 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 710 litres | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 206 has 21 litres more trunk space than the Ford KA. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 282 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Ford KA, which means Peugeot 206 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`384 | 1`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford KA has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Ford KA, so Ford KA quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Ford KA has
| |