Peugeot 206 2009 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Peugeot 206) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volkswagen Fox) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Fox is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Fox, but torque is 36 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 6.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 206 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.54 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 206 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 1016 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 206 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. This could mean that the Peugeot 206 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 24 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`476 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Fox has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Fox quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |