Peugeot 206 2009 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 27 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 35 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.8 | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 206 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | no data | |
| Peugeot 206 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`476 | 1`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |