Peugeot 206 2009 vs Mazda 2 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 18 HP less power than Mazda 2, but torque is 38 NM more than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.4 | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 206 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 2 2008 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Peugeot 206 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`476 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |