Peugeot 206 2009 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 27 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.2 | |
| Peugeot 206 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 787 litres | |
| Peugeot 206 has 39 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 205 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Peugeot 206 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`476 | 1`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 385 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |